In it the authors emphasize that the "following examination Yet even with a constant reiteration of this awareness, a notable stress on Sasanian aggression still percolates through the text.
For instance, the authors at one point characterize the Sasanians as a "dangerous opponent" p. Nearly every introductory paragraph in each chapter of Part II contains some subtle additions that serve to embody the authors' commitment to addressing their scholarly peers' suggestions. Chapter 2 'Warfare' , a new chapter, while incredibly short seven pages, three with illustrations , is a worthwhile addition.
Though not comprehensive, it provides a manageable commentary on two Late Antique sources on Sasanian armament and tactics, namely one passage from both Heliodorus' Aethiopica and Maurice's Strategikon.
At the same time, a supplement of what is known about Sasanian warfare from an archaeological perspective admittedly not the focus of this book would have benefited interested readers. This is unfortunate given that our knowledge of the Sasanian world is impaired if seen only through the lens of textual evidence. The next significant addition is located in Chapter 3 'Military confrontations' , which includes a treatment of the very "Eastern textual In a subsection dealing with Shapur I's wars with Rome, Ferdowsi, the author of the Iranian epic, the Shahnameh, is presented as an exemplar of the so-called "Eastern" perspective pps.
However, claims that the illustrations of a Shahnameh commissioned in C. The lack of the mention of Daqiqi the initiator of the New Persian Shahnameh and of the Xwaday Namag the original Sasanian 'book of kings' on which the Shahnameh was based; acknowledged on p. In Chapter 3 the authors also significantly add to their discussion of the first Sasanian-Byzantine war C.
Chapter 6 'Shared interests: Continuing conflicts' includes a new subchapter 'Armenia' , which in its depth and scope is an excellent, and essential, addition to the book. The authors provide Greek, Latin, and Armenian sources in their treatment of the geopolitical importance of Armenia during this period. As it is often difficult to elucidate the history of Armenia because of a later adoption of a native textual historiography, the authors have struck a reasonable balance in their inclusion of Armenian sources. Admittedly, Armenian scholars might opt for a different selection, but, given the constraints of scale, the authors have succeeded commendably.
Still, the authors questionably highlight the Armenian cultural refusal to 'accept' the Zoroastrian religion without discussing the originally long and mutually influential Iranian-Armenian cultural relationship. The next new chapter, Chapter 8 'Emperor and King of kings' is another that deals with the further incorporation of the "Sasanian voice" into the chronicle of Roman-Sasanian relations.
Here the authors pay particular attention to the idea of the construction of kingship in Sasanian Iran, and its significance for then contemporary international politics. The content of this chapter will be especially useful to those coming from a Roman-Latin tradition. Karnamag i Artaxsher i Papagan may herald the integration of more Middle Persian sources into narratives involving ancient Iran and Rome, and provides much-needed insight into the cultural milieu of Sasanian kingship.
The last additions to the book can be found in the Appendices. Appendix I now contains a small, but highly useful chronologically tabulated list of the Sasanian kings side by side with their Roman counterparts an improvement on the German original. The authors have also completely revised their glossary by including 11 new entries and deleting five original entries. Unfortunately, a number of typographical and editorial errors have crept into the new text, artifacts of the press, and they do not significantly detract from the otherwise high quality of the presentation and translation.
Some errors include dates p. More significant criticism must extend, however, to an imbalance in the way that Roman sources tend to be accepted at least provisionally, while reports from Arab, Persian, or Syriac traditions are typified.
- Organizational Leadership: Build a Strong Organization, One Person at a Time.
- افسانة پیگردهای دینی بزرگ در روزگار شاپور دوم!
- Beauty and the Firefly;
- Rome and Persia in Late Antiquity: Neighbours and Rivals!
- DON’T FUCK YOUR SECRETARY OR WE’LL FUCK YOU! A Blackmail Sex erotica story (Blackmailed For Sex).
- Rome and Persia in Late Antiquity: Neighbours and Rivals.
Where reference is made to the latter traditions, one finds, for instance, such statements as: " The non-Roman tradition is reduced, in short, to embellishment and exaggeration. What is more confusing is that the authors also refer to the analogous tendency of omitted defeats in Western historiography p. This imbalance only complements the ideologically insurmountable chasm that the authors have constructed between the Sasanians and the Romans under the aegis of an "East and West" division. It is seemingly a continuation of the German original's "tangible eurocentrism which taint[ed] the book's achievements"--a Eurocentrism which can be detected even in the new chapters of the publication.
The creation of such broad monolithic categories severely curtails the intellectual mobility of this work at an interpretive level. In the quest for creating anachronistic, "natural kinds", the authors overlook some of the defining characteristics of these civilizations that contributed to their uniqueness. For example, to understand Sasanian ideology is to understand that the Sasanians were marked by their desire to connect to their perception of their Iranian heritage.
Understanding the emergence of "Eranshahr", i. It was his goal to reconcile questions of security with the control over the trade with the East, which was so important for Rome. From now on economic and strategic factors were also important in the diplomatic relations between both empires 2.
Although there were still unsolved problems to do with the spread of information through diplomats, defectors and spies 35 , for the time being the peace treaty of Nisibis formed the beginning of a peaceful period between Rome and Persia that would last for forty years — an exceptionally long period of peace in the history of Roman— Sasanian relations. They did not play a decisive role in Roman— Sasanian relations. It looks as if Hormizd II embarked on an unsuccessful Western campaign, possibly in order to take revenge for his father Narse's humiliating defeat, which he had witnessed.
[PDF] Rome and Persia in Late Antiquity: Neighbours and Rivals | Semantic Scholar
His Western advance, however, did not bear an impact on the peace of This peace between Romans and Persians ended during the reign of Sapur II —79 , who renewed the aggressive Western policy of the early Sasanian kings. Sapur II intended to recover not only those territories 73 On the development of this patt of the Roman frontier see Graf 1—26; Kennedy ; Bowersock 76—; Isaac — Kawerau ; cf. Assfalg 19—36; on the significance of this source see Kettenhofen b: Sapur II was still a child when he took over the throne but soon managed to consolidate his reign — the longest and one of the most renowned reigns of all Sasanian kings.
The year was an important turning-point because at this time hostilities with Rome started again. Changes in religious affairs that had occurred within the Roman Empire dramatically affected the relationship between the two great powers. The reign of Constantine the Great —37 ushered in the turning-point known as the 'Constantinian Revolution'.
From onwards non-Christian religions were therefore repressed and the Christianisation of the Roman Empire took place at a much accelerated pace. The fact that Constantine turned to Christianity and furthered this religion in state and society encouraged the Christians in Persia to bond even more than before with their fellow-believers in the Roman Empire. It is therefore not surprising that when the military confrontations between the two great powers resumed long-lasting and severe persecutions of the Christians in Persia began.
Numerous acts of martyrs reflect the suffering of the Christians in this period and illustrate the political character of the persecutions When Constantine the Great died on 22 May in the middle of his preparations for the Persian War, Sapur II used the opportunity to conquer Armenia, which had been Christianised since the beginning of the fourth century.
The attack formed a prelude to numerous armed confrontations between Rome and Persia. Neither of the two sides gained any major advantages during this period 7. Sl Blockley —90; on Constantius' objectives see Warmington When, moreover, in the spring of Julian was pro- claimed Augustus by his army in Paris, Constantius was forced to intervene against him in the West but died on his way in Cilicia on 3 November Towards the beginning of the year his successor to the throne, Julian, renewed the Roman offensive in the East in order to deal with the situation along the Eastern frontier of the Roman Empire once and for all.
His advance far into Sasanian territory was successful at first but ended in catastrophe. The emperor was wounded in battle and died on 26 June 8. In great haste a new emperor, Jovian —4 , was proclaimed, who had to conclude a peace with Sapur II immediately. Jovian was in a hopeless situation and his main concern would have been to lead his army safely back to Roman territory; he therefore had no choice but to agree to the peace terms dictated by Sapur II, namely to surrender the conquests made by Diocletian, to give up Nisibis and Singara and to withdraw from Armenia The hope for a lasting peace was not fulfilled.
Sapur II felt bound by the treaty of only as long as Jovian was alive. When the Roman emperor died in the following year he went back to his aggressive policy against Rome. In he embarked on a campaign against Armenia 8 , which led to nothing less than the division of Armenia between the Romans and the Sasanians.
When Sapur II died in Persia was more powerful than ever before. The king had been one of the greatest rulers on the Sasanian throne and was admired even by authors biased against him, such as Ammianus Marcellinus. The king was determined to retain peace with the Romans. The sources further illustrate good relations at the beginning of this century by telling us that the emperor Arcadius — asked Yazdgard I to become the guardian of his infant son Theodosius after his death 9.
- A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EARLY AND LATE SASSANIAN COINAGE | Journal for Semitics!
- About This Item.
- Growing Up Stupid, (Mostly) True Stories from Sidney, Maine!
- Literature of the Holocaust (Blooms Period Studies).
However, refraining from an expansive foreign policy against Byzantium and sympathising with the Christians made Yazdgard I the target of accusations by the bellicose Per- sian nobility as well as the Zoroastrian priesthood. Towards the end of Yazdgard's reign the Christians were persecuted again When the latter refused, the Sasanian king continued the persecutions initiated by his predecessor. Moreover, in the year Bahram V started a war with Byzantium. As neither of the two sides achieved any noteworthy successes, the war did not last for very long and a peace was concluded just one year later In the following period armed confrontations were only occasional and of short duration.
The growing Christological differences within Christianity, 90 85 On the Byzantine— Sasanian telations in the fifth century see Synelli 47—73; Rubin —95 and Whitby After the Councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon 91 numerous followers of Nestorius' doctrine of Christ's dual nature fled to Persia and became crucial supporters of the Sasanian dynasty 92 In contrast to the Christians, who were attached to the see at Antioch, the Nestorians were not seen as potential spies but rather as allies in the battle against Byzantium.
At the same time the Byzantine emperor's claim to be the sole legitimate representative of the Christian Church was rejected. In the year Barsauma, a fanatical follower of Nestorianism, used his influence to the effect that the synod of Bet Lapat, 94 supported by the Sasanian ruler Peroz , imposed the Nestorian religion on all Christian communities in Persia.